Concordance between Self-Reported Visual Difficulty and Objective Visual Impairment: The National Health and Aging Trends Study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the performance of self-reported visual difficulty (VD) in predicting objective visual impairment (VI) in older adults and explore factors that influence discordance in these classifications. DesignCross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2022). MethodsParticipants reporting blindness or difficulties with distance or near vision were characterized as having VD. Presenting binocular distance visual acuity (VA), near VA, and contrast sensitivity (CS) were assessed. Objective VI was defined as having VI in either distance VA (worse than 20/40), near VA (worse than 20/40), or CS (worse than 1.55 logCS). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare performance of VD in predicting objective VI. To investigate factors that influence discordance, we limited our sample to adults with objective VI and employed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with not reporting VD. Similar analyses were performed to explore factors associated with reporting VD in adults without objective VI. Results4,999 adults were included in the 2022 cohort. VD achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 56.0 (95% CI: 55.2, 56.9) in predicting objective VI, with a sensitivity of 15.8 (95% CI: 14.2, 17.5) and specificity of 96.3 (95% CI: 95.5, 96.9). Characteristics associated with not reporting VD in adults with objective VI included: female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.99]), Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.78), higher income (≥75k, OR: 1.99 [95% CI: 1.14, 3.45]), having ≥4 comorbidities (OR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.29, 0.72]), and having depressive symptoms (OR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.25, 0.93]). Meanwhile, factors associated with self-reporting VD in the absence of objective VI included Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 2.11 [95% CI: 1.15, 3.86]), higher income (≥75k, OR: 0.27 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.63]), and having anxiety symptoms (OR: 3.05 [95% CI: 1.56, 5.97]). ConclusionsSelf-reported visual difficulty is a distinct measure assessing disability and has limited ability in predicting objective VI. Caution is advised when utilizing self-reported visual difficulty as a surrogate measure for objective VI in epidemiological studies, though it may still be an effective way to capture risk of current or future disability.