Abstract

Introduction: Preventing unintended pregnancies is important among all women, including those living with HIV. Increasing numbers of women, including HIV-positive women, choose progestin-containing subdermal implants, which are one of the most effective forms of contraception. However, drug–drug interactions between contraceptive hormones and efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) may reduce implant effectiveness. We present four inter-related perspectives on this issue.Discussion: First, as a case study, we discuss how limited data prompted country-level guidance against the use of implants among women concomitantly using efavirenz in South Africa and its subsequent negative effects on the use of implants in general. Second, we discuss the existing clinical data on this topic, including the observational study from Kenya showing women using implants plus efavirenz-based ART had three-fold higher rates of pregnancy than women using implants plus nevirapine-based ART. However, the higher rates of pregnancy in the implant plus efavirenz group were still lower than the pregnancy rates among women using common alternative contraceptive methods, such as injectables. Third, we discuss the four pharmacokinetic studies that show 50–70% reductions in plasma progestin concentrations in women concurrently using efavirenz-based ART as compared to women not on any ART. These pharmacokinetic studies provide the biologic basis for the clinical findings. Fourth, we discuss how data on this topic have marked implications for both family planning and HIV programmes and policies globally.Conclusion: This controversy underlines the importance of integrating family planning services into routine HIV care, counselling women appropriately on increased risk of pregnancy with concomitant implant and efavirenz use, and expanding contraceptive method mix for all women. As global access to ART expands, greater research is needed to explore implant effectiveness when used concomitantly with newer ART regimens. Data on how HIV-positive women and their partners choose contraceptives, as well as information from providers on how they present and counsel patients on contraceptive options are needed to help guide policy and service delivery. Lastly, greater collaboration between HIV and reproductive health experts at all levels are needed to develop successful strategies to ensure the best HIV and reproductive health outcomes for women living with HIV.

Highlights

  • Preventing unintended pregnancies is important among all women, including those living with HIV

  • The first perspective examines a case study of how, based on limited data, authorities in South Africa recommended against the use of implants for women concomitantly using efavirenz, and how this policy led to unintended negative consequences

  • We conclude with specific research recommendations that will aid providers and policy makers in helping HIV-positive women actualize their reproductive intentions with appropriate information, while maintaining options for highly effective family planning alongside antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Up to 62% of pregnancies among women living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa are unintended, contributing to HIVrelated maternal morbidity and vertical HIV transmission [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Longacting reversible contraception (LARC), including progestincontaining subdermal implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs), are preferred by the World Health Organization (WHO) [11], and implants are the most effective LARC with increasing use in sub-Saharan Africa, including among HIV-positive women [9,10,12,13,14]. Reduced implant effectiveness is thought to be related to lower systemic progestin concentrations [20,21] This issue is important because efavirenz-based ART remains the recommended first-line regimen by the WHO [22]. The first perspective examines a case study of how, based on limited data, authorities in South Africa recommended against the use of implants for women concomitantly using efavirenz, and how this policy led to unintended negative consequences. We conclude with specific research recommendations that will aid providers and policy makers in helping HIV-positive women actualize their reproductive intentions with appropriate information, while maintaining options for highly effective family planning alongside ART

Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call