Conclusion

Abstract

After considering oral history and memory in the context of the Oxford Group study, this chapter summarizes the content of the book, relating the Oxford Group case study to the theoretical framework outlined in the introduction. It confirms that the solitary genius model of creative endeavor is not, for the most part, supported. That is, the work produced by members of the Oxford Group, and Singer’s in particular, was the product of collaboration. The Oxford Group had many of the characteristics of a collaborative circle as identified by Farrell. However, some nuances of this particular collaborative circle are identified. In addition, some challenges to the model as an explanatory device are raised. Collaborative circles do not exist in isolation, and account needs to be taken of wider social networks, the academic environment to which, Singer in particular, was exposed, and the prevailing social, economic, and political environment.