Abstract
The International Criminal Court (ICC) would resolve the issue of geographic equity by dealing with the RohingyaRohingya crisis. On the other hand, MyanmarMyanmar, where evidence on the human rights situation of the RohingyaRohingya would be found, is a Non-State Party to the ICC, and the prospects of a successful investigation and prosecution by theInternational Criminal Court (ICC)Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) [of the ICC] ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) are currently low. However, the persecuted RohingyaRohingya are within the territory of BangladeshBangladesh, a State Party to the ICC, and there is a good chance that they will be able to testify. Given that the ICC advocates the principle of complementarity, in which the ICC complements a state’s jurisdiction, there is also an expectation that MyanmarMyanmar itself will seriously address the issue of human rights violations related to the RohingyaRohingya crisis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
