Conclusion

Abstract

This chapter explores the implications of a poor-led, pro-poor approach to poverty reduction for the question of political responsibility. The author argues that once poor-led social movements are acknowledged as vital for transformative social change, different responsibilities emerge—for diverse agents—than those commonly stipulated by global justice theorists. The chapter develops the idea that there is a “political responsibility for solidarity” with poor-led organizations and social movements: those with resources and political freedoms can and should help to support, defend, and amplify the agendas of these groups. After considering some key features and normative criteria of political solidarity, the author discusses how a political responsibility to act in solidarity with poor-led organizations and social movements might be taken up by differently located (individual and collective) actors in the global North and South. The chapter also addresses some tensions raised by the suggestion that nonpoor “outsiders”—including individuals and organizations or institutions with comparative power and privilege—can learn to be effective allies, working in solidarity with poor activists.