Abstract
Abstract The conclusion compares and contrasts the different regime strategies and repertories of repression and concession towards civil society actors in Egypt and Jordan. It further discusses the mobilization and demobilization strategies of civil society actors in both countries. It draws some conclusions on the region and suggests further research directions for contentious politics in authoritarian regimes. It the question of why authoritarian regimes utilize different repressive strategies towards civil society actors and how these actors respond to these strategies. The chapter demonstrates that repressive strategies towards civil society actors vary in authoritarian regimes, depending on the regime’s recent experience with breakdown and/or continuity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
