Concerns and frustrations about the public reporting of device-related healthcare-associated infections: Perspectives of hospital leaders and staff

Abstract

BackgroundPublic reporting of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) aims to incentivize improvement in infection prevention. The motivation and mechanisms of public reporting have raised concerns about the reliability of this data, but little is known about the specific concerns of hospital leaders and staff. This study sought to better understand perspectives of individuals in these roles regarding the identification and public reporting of HAIs. MethodsWe conducted interviews with 471 participants including hospitals leaders (eg, administrative and clinical leaders) and hospital staff (eg, physicians and nurses) between 2017 and 2019 across 18 US hospitals. A semistructured interview guide was used to explore perspectives about the use of HAI data within the context of management strategies used to support infection prevention. ResultsInterviewees described concerns about public reporting of HAI data, including a lack of trust in the data and inadvertent consequences of its public reporting, as well as specific frustrations related to the identification and accountability for publicly-reported HAIs. ConclusionConcerns and frustrations related to public reporting of HAI data highlight the need for improved guidelines, transparency, and incentives. Efforts to build trust in publicly-reported HAI data can help ensure this information is used effectively to improve infection prevention practices.