Abstract

There has been a massive increase in recent years of the use of lead (Pb) isotopes in attempts to better understand sources and pathways of Pb in the environment and in man or experimental animals. Unfortunately, there have been many cases where the quality of the isotopic data, especially that obtained by quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Q-ICP-MS), are questionable, resulting in questionable identification of potential sources, which, in turn, impacts study interpretation and conclusions. We present several cases where the isotopic data have compromised interpretation because of the use of only the major isotopes 208Pb/206Pb and 207Pb/206Pb, or their graphing in other combinations. We also present some examples comparing high precision data from thermal ionization (TIMS) or multi-collector plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS) to illustrate the deficiency in the Q-ICP-MS data. In addition, we present cases where Pb isotopic ratios measured on Q-ICP-MS are virtually impossible for terrestrial samples. We also evaluate the Pb isotopic data for rat studies, which had concluded that Pb isotopic fractionation occurs between different organs and suggest that this notion of biological fractionation of Pb as an explanation for isotopic differences is not valid. Overall, the brief review of these case studies shows that Q-ICP-MS as commonly practiced is not a suitable technique for precise and accurate Pb isotopic analysis in the environment and health fields.

Highlights

  • Three main mass spectrometric methods have been used to obtain Pb isotopic data with high precision for thermal ionization (TIMS) and multi-collector plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS)and medium to low precision with a single detector magnetic-sector field ICP-MS (ICP-SMS) and quadrupole Q-ICP-MS

  • TIMS and MC-ICP-MS are instruments with multiple detectors designed for isotopic ratio determination and are used in geochemistry where high precision and accuracy of isotopic ratios are necessary for interpretation

  • We provide examples where ICP-MS measurements on the same samples have been made with MC-ICP-MS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three main mass spectrometric methods have been used to obtain Pb isotopic data with high precision for thermal ionization (TIMS) and multi-collector plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS)and medium to low precision with a single detector magnetic-sector field ICP-MS (ICP-SMS) and quadrupole Q-ICP-MS. Three main mass spectrometric methods have been used to obtain Pb isotopic data with high precision for thermal ionization (TIMS) and multi-collector plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS). MC-ICP-MS Pb analysis using thallium for mass-bias correction has become the method of choice for high-precision Pb isotope work [2,3]. TIMS and MC-ICP-MS are instruments with multiple detectors designed for isotopic ratio determination and are used in geochemistry where high precision and accuracy of isotopic ratios are necessary for interpretation. The disadvantages of these instruments are their high cost and the need for labor-intensive sample preparation in ultraclean laboratories. The environmental and environmental health fields are dominated by isotopic measurements obtained with Q-ICP-MS because of the relative cheapness and

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.