Abstract
Various definitions of simple continuous arcs and closed curves have been given.t The definitions of arcs usually contain the requirement that the point-set in question should be bounded. In attempting to prove that every interval t of an open curve as defined in a recent papert is a simple continuous arc, while I found it easy to prove that t satisfies all the other requirements of Janiszewski's definition (modified as indicated below) it was only by a rather lengthy and complicated argument that I succeeded in proving that it satisfies the requirement of boundedness. In Lennes' definition the requirement of boundedness is superfluous.? However I found it difficult to prove that t satisfies a certain one of the other requirements of this definition, namely that the point-set in question should contain no proper connected subset that contains both A and B. In the present paper I will give a definition l of a simple continuous arc which stipulates neither that the set 111 should be bounded nor that it should contain no proper connected subset containing both A and B. I will show that, in a euclidean space of two dimensions, every point-set that satisfies this definition is an arc in the sense of Jordan. It is easy to prove? that every interval of an open curve satisfies this definition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.