Abstract
AbstractA critical review is made of the results of magnetic field measurements in prominences obtained by the Zeeman and Hanle methods. By considering the example of three prominences, some discrepancies between the methods are shown. The authors consider that the magnetic field measurements by the Hanle method inadequately represent the actual magnetic field pattern. To overcome these discrepancies a comparative analysis of magnetic field measurements in prominences by both methods is required.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
