Abstract
This research paper investigates the dynamic nature of armed conflicts, with a specific emphasis on the differentiation between international and non-international armed conflicts (NIACs) within the context of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). International conflicts encompass intricate diplomatic dynamics, but NIACs are distinguished by their tendency towards political instability, external intervention, and socioeconomic inequalities. This study highlights the importance of Common Article 3 and Protocol 2 of the Geneva Conventions in effectively addressing the intricate nature of armed conflicts, providing crucial safeguards for individuals irrespective of territorial boundaries. The author also highlighted the significance of elucidating the extent and understanding of NIACs in order to mitigate breaches of humanitarian law and safeguard both civilians and combatants. The research ultimately supports the implementation of IHL principles as a means to reduce the human toll of armed conflicts and protect humanitarian standards.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have