Abstract

The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Ex situ catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass is a promising route for the production of fungible liquid bio- fuels. There is significant ongoing research on the design and development of catalysts for this process. However, there are a limited number of studies investigating process configurations and their effects on biorefinery economics. Herein we present a conceptual process design with techno-economic assessment; it includes the production of upgraded bio-oil via fixed bed ex situ catalytic fast pyrol- ysis followed by final hydroprocessing to hydrocarbon fuel blendstocks. This study builds upon previous work using fluidized bed systems, as detailed in a recent design report led by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL/ TP-5100-62455); overall yields are assumed to be similar, and are based on enabling future feasibility. Assuming similar yields provides a basis for easy comparison and for studying the impacts of areas of focus in this study, namely, fixed bed reactor configurations and their catalyst development requirements, and the impacts of an inline hot gas filter. A comparison with the fluidized bed system shows that there is potential for higher capital costs and lower catalyst costs in the fixed bed system, leading to comparable overall costs. The key catalyst requirement is to enable the effective transformation of highly oxygenated biomass into hydrocarbons products with properties suit- able for blending into current fuels. Potential catalyst materials are discussed, along with their suitability for deoxygenation, hydrogenation and C-C coupling chem- istry. This chemistry is necessary during pyrolysis vapor upgrading for improved bio-oil quality, which enables efficient downstream hydroprocessing; C-C coupling helps increase the proportion of diesel/jet fuel range product. One potential benefit of fixed bed upgrading over fluidized bed upgrading is catalyst flexibility, providing greater control over chemistry and product composition. Since this study is based on future projections, the impacts of uncertainties in the underlying assumptions are quantified via sensitivity analysis. This analysis indicates that catalyst researchers should prioritize by: carbon efficiency(catalyst cost(catalyst lifetime, after initially testing for basic operational feasibility.

Highlights

  • Fast pyrolysis of biomass at ca. 500 °C and short residence times produces high liquid yields (60–75 %) upon vapor condensation [1]

  • This study presented a conceptual process design and techno-economic assessment for production of hydrocarbon fuel blendstock from biomass by fast pyrolysis followed by ex situ catalytic vapor-phase upgrading

  • A fixed bed upgrading reactor system with a hot gas filter was proposed and compared to the fluidized bed upgrading system detailed in a recent design report led by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fast pyrolysis of biomass at ca. 500 °C and short residence times (ca. 2 s) produces high liquid yields (60–75 %) upon vapor condensation [1]. Potential process configurations for catalytic upgrading of pyrolysis vapors include (1) in situ, or within the fast pyrolysis reactor, and (2) ex situ, or in separate reactors after the removal of bulk solids including reactor bed material, char, and mineral matter. These process configurations were detailed in a recent design report led by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) [5]. We modified the prior conceptual design to develop a process model in Aspen Plus to investigate the potential use of fixed bed ex situ catalytic systems for fast pyrolysis vapor upgrading. All three configurations are illustrated in a simplified diagram (Fig. 1)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call