Abstract
Responses to word problems involving rates of change were collected on four occasions during and after 24 hours of concept-based calculus instruction given to a group of first-year university students, all of whom had studied calculus in secondary school. The number of students who could symbolize rates of change in noncomplex situations increased dramatically. However, there was almost no increase in the number who could symbolize rates of change in complex items or in items that required modeling a situation using algebraic variables. Detailed analysis revealed three main categories of error, in all of which variables are treated as symbols to be manipulated rather than as quantities to be related. We surmise that the students had developed an “abstract-apart” concept of a variable rather than the “abstract-general” concept that is needed for the successful study of calculus.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
