Abstract
In this work, we firstly report on the rigorous design, optimization, and carbon emission analysis of the processes separating acrylonitrile (AN), acetonitrile (AC), and water. Two bi-sectional processes, which integrate heterogeneous extractive distillation with hybrid extraction-distillation (the HHED process), and that with pressure swing distillation (the HPSD process), are proposed. Compared with the existing configuration, operation using 30% less entrainer amount is found feasible for both processes, leading to 9.8% energy saving. Also, the optimized HHED process saves 4.8% total annual cost (TAC) and 5.8% carbon emission from the optimized HPSD process. Besides, implementing a vapor recompression cycle on the optimized HHED process reduces 31.1% CO2 emission but increases 6.6% of TAC. On the other hand, the heat-integrated HPSD process with an economizer design does not outperform the non-integrated HHED process. Finally, separation using heterogeneous azeotropic distillation or hybrid extraction-distillation process in single is conceptually rejected. Through this work, the industrial guidance could be provided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
