Abstract

Mathematical knowledge has been defined in several ways in the literature of mathematics education. Procedural knowledge (PK) and conceptual knowledge (CK) or both types of knowledge are the emphasis of knowledge construction. This is a research-based paper extracted from a dissertation of MEd in mathematics education of the first author under the supervision of the remaining two authors. In this context, this explanatory mixed method research study was carried out to find students’ level of PK and CK in algebra and explore why students develop such knowledge. In the quantitative part, the survey was conducted among 360 students of grade eight of 9 public schools of Kathmandu Metropolitan City. The study revealed that students have a lower level of CK (x̅ =8.56) but a higher level of PK (y̅ =14.05) out of 20 and a moderate positive correlation (r=+0.559, p<0.05) between PK and CK. The regression equation was: CK=3.716+0.345(PK). Similarly, PK was dependent, but CK was independent upon the gender of the respondents. In the qualitative part, a two-phase interview was conducted with six participants followed by a group discussion with four mathematics teachers teaching at the same level. This phase concluded that students are weak in reasoning, critical thinking, representational knowledge and comparing algebraic quantities. The reason is because students seemed to be forced/encouraged to develop procedural fluency because of teachers’ methods of teaching which oftentimes neglect the progressive pedagogical approaches. The research is useful for everyone who is working on educational reform to emphasize meaningful learning.

Highlights

  • A debate or a math war (Klein, 2007) between procedural knowledge/skill and conceptual knowledge is not new in mathematics teaching and learning

  • In the thorough discussion with teachers, we found that teachers want their students to develop both conceptual knowledge (CK) and Procedural knowledge (PK) in mathematics using the emerging and innovative pedagogical approaches in teaching and learning because the instructional practices matter in knowledge creation, the real-life examples used by teachers and created by students can enhance a deeper understanding of contents presented, the job is challenging, and the use of teaching-learning materials are the great resources to develop CK

  • The quantitative findings show the lower level of CK as compared to PK with the moderate positive correlation and positive dependency of CK on PK as per the regression model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A debate or a math war (Klein, 2007) between procedural knowledge/skill and conceptual knowledge is not new in mathematics teaching and learning. The relationship between conceptual and procedural knowledge has been an issue of debate among mathematics researchers in education (Zuya, 2017). This debate leads to a question that which knowledge comes first. The instructional practices emphasize more on students to memorize formulae, steps or procedures to solve the problems in mathematics than encourage them to be creative, ask questions, think critically, and play with the situation so that they use their highest potentiality to construct knowledge with the underlying concept which is rich in connection with deep meaning, a conceptual knowledge (Lenz et al, 2020; Rittle-Johnson, 2019; Star, 2005)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call