Concepts and revised models for Phanerozoic orogenic gold deposits

Abstract

Abstract Existing published models for orogenic gold deposits (OGDs) do not adequately describe or explain most deposits of Phanerozoic age, and there are numerous reasons why Phanerozoic OGDs might differ significantly from older deposits. We subdivide Phanerozoic OGDs into four main subtypes, based on a number of descriptive criteria, including tectonic setting, lithological siting, and characteristics of the mineralization in each subtype. The four subtypes are: (1) crustal-scale fault-associated (CSF) subtype, (2) sediment-hosted orogenic gold (SHOG) subtype, (3) forearc (FA) subtype, and (4) syn- and late tectonic dispersed (SLTD) subtype. Lead isotopic studies suggest that Pb and other metals in all but the FA subtype were likely derived from relatively small source reservoirs in the middle or upper crust. OGDs formed in large, lithologically and structurally homogeneous regions will tend to be of the same subtype; however, in geologically complex orogenic belts it is common to find two or more subtypes that formed at approximately the same time. Based on the synthesis of global OGDs of Phanerozoic age, districts containing CSF or SHOG subtype deposits appear to have the best potential for hosting multiple large deposits. FA subtype deposits form in a relatively uncommon tectonic setting (accretionary forearc, possibly overlying a subducting spreading ridge) and are likely to be rare. SLTD subtype OGDs are the most common, but most are small and uneconomic, although they commonly generate substantial alluvial gold deposits.