Abstract
Does concentration in the banking sector boost banks’ resilience, or make them more fragile? We propose an analysis of the simultaneous impact of several mediators of concentration on the stability of the banking sector. Results from a sample of world economies observed from 1997 to 2015 support the hypothesis that the impact of mediators is non-linear and depends on the level of concentration. If concentration is at about 50% or lower, increasing concentration improves the stability of the banking sector via profitability. If concentration is at 65% or above, increasing concentration further makes the banking system more fragile because of the mediating effects of credit risk, diversification, and ease of monitoring. For intermediate levels of concentration, the impact of the competing moderators cancels each other out. If aggregated upon concentration, these non-linearities give rise to a non-monotonic impact of concentration on the stability of banks. We thus contribute novel insights into the complex nexus between banking market concentration and financial stability. Further, we add to the policy debate by finding that an intermediate level of concentration is optimal from the policymakers’ perspective.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
