Concentration-guided strategies in drug development: experience with a cyclosporine analog in transplantation.

Abstract

A concentration-guided study was designed to maintain adequate immunosuppression and avoid excessive drug exposure while determining steady-state relative bioavailability of two cyclosporine G (CyG) oral formulations in stable renal transplant patients. In period I (week 1), 26 patients taking cyclosporine A (CyA)-based immunosuppressive regimens entered the study. Doses were titrated to maintain trough concentrations within a predefined range, as measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). Patients were given an oral solution of CyG in period II (weeks 2-3), and a microemulsion capsule formulation of CyG in period III (weeks 4-5), with dose titration as necessary to achieve trough concentrations in a predefined range, as measured by FPIA. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on the last day of each study period. Treatment with CyA was reinitiated in period IV (week 6) at the same doses as at study entry. All blood samples were analyzed at the conclusion of the study using CyG- and CyA-specific high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). When changing from oral solution to capsule for CyG, an average 19% dose reduction was necessary to compensate for the elevated trough concentrations resulting from the increased bioavailability of the capsule formulation. The concentration-guided strategy was successful in avoiding over-exposure, and resulted in comparable values for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for both formulations of CyG. Dose normalization of the pharmacokinetic parameters subsequently allowed calculation of the relative bioavailability. Specifically, a faster rate and greater extent of CyG absorption from the capsule than the oral solution were manifested as a slightly earlier time to peak concentration (tmax), an average 44% increase in the maximum concentration (Cmax), and an average 29% increase in AUC. This experience demonstrated that a concentration-guided trial design allowed a drug development question for a compound with a narrow therapeutic index to be addressed safely and directly in the target patient population.