Abstract

SummaryIn this paper, we concatenated of three‐dimensional parity check (3D‐PC) block and polar codes for improving error correction performance and bit error rate (BER). Three different sizes of 3D parity check blocks (4 × 4 × 4, 8 × 8 × 8, and 16 × 16 × 16) are used for polar code concatenation. The 4 × 4 × 4 block returns the best performance, but higher complexity of decoder is needed unlikely. The 8 × 8 × 8 has returned acceptable complexity and good performacne. The complexity of decoder is less in the case of 16 × 16 × 16 with slight performance. The performance of the 3D‐PC is reduced when the codewords length is increased. The experiment considered the presence of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with Rayleigh and Rician fading environments. 3D‐PC and polar code concatenation is more precise with codewords of short length, whereas there is insufficient concatenation accuracy with longer codewords. The outcomes of this study contain comparison between AWGN, Rayleigh, and Rician environments. The AWGN is noticed to have a lesser negative impact on the performance of code. Furthermore, increasing the code length may slightly fill the gap of performance between the concatenated and none concatenated polar codes due to the impact of code length on parity check code performance. Simulation results showed the coding performance in case of the polar code with concatenation and without concatenation for different code lengths. Generally, the 3D‐PC polar code concatenation is drawn the optimal result in AWGN environments.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call