Abstract
AbstractMultipulse signaling applied to optical communication channels has become known as a bandwidth efficient signaling format [1]. However, to achieve reliable communication in noisy channels we must resort to some sort of coding. In this article, concatenated coding, recommended by the Consultive Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS), is investigated [2] and compared to the standard Reed‐Solomon coding of pulse position modulation signaling.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
