Abstract
This paper presents the results of a semiotic inspection of two web accessibility evaluation tools widely used for web editor tools: the Emphatic System Editor for Accessibility (EE4A) and the Test of Accessibility Web Content Manager system System (TAW-CMS). The Semiotic Inspection Method, from Semiotics Engineering, provides an analysis of the communicability of interactive systems. Results show EE4A is focused to nontechnical users while TAW-CMS targets more technical and accessibility profiles. As a final thought, it is proposed that Web 2.0 development environments should require appropriate assessment tools for non-technical people.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
