Abstract

The author argues that polity and policies of Getúlio Vargas’s Estado Novo cannot be fully understood without exploring the legacy of Rio Grande do Sul. The southern state’s first republican governor, Júlio de Castilhos, had taken inspiration in Auguste Comte’s multifaceted political philosophy and inculcated its authoritarian traits into political institutions. Yet, he and his followers substantially adapted Comte’s positivism to the specific economic and political circumstances in their republiqueta sui generis. In contrast to Comte, the State merged temporal and spiritual powers to pursue evolutionary political changes, a balanced socioeconomic modernisation, and the incorporation of the populus qua paternalistic public policies, and all this with a strong focus on education. Changing contexts resulted in further adjustments, when Vargas became governor in 1928: an ‘orderly’ inclusion of the opposition into the polity, a stronger state interventionism in the economy and labor market, and an experimentation with state corporatism. These experiences paved the way for this comtismo-turned-castilhismo-turning-varguismo to enter the national stage two years later. Despite all the compromises with other contenders for power that Vargas had to make thereafter, he and his gaúcho and other co-opted protégés remained united in the strong belief in technical solutions to social problems and a quest for rational institutions to carry out transformative policies. For them, the State was to be agent of development, tutor of corporate interest groups, and now also guarantor of national security. While highlighting the significant, and still underestimated, impact of French positivism on Vargas’s first 15 years in government, the article places emphasis on the pragmatic dimensions of its appropriation, propagation, and reinterpretation by two generations of state-builders.

Highlights

  • Introduction and ArgumentGetúlio Vargas remains Brazil’s most important statesman of the past century

  • The 1937 coup that established the authoritarian-corporatist Estado Novo was for Vargas a revolution “from above,”[1] ratifying his decision to take power in 1930 and allowing him to embark on a comprehensive state-led program of administrative reorganization, economic modernization, national integration, and labor legislation

  • For Edgard Carone (1976, 12), one of the first historians to investigate this regime, it marked the beginning of “[t]he whole process of social change” that Brazil saw during the subsequent decades

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Getúlio Vargas remains Brazil’s most important statesman of the past century. His 19 years in government (1930-45, 1951-54) profoundly transformed the relationship between economy, the State, and society and provided points of reference for successive governments. The 1937 coup that established the authoritarian-corporatist Estado Novo was for Vargas a revolution “from above,”[1] ratifying his decision to take power in 1930 and allowing him to embark on a comprehensive state-led program of administrative reorganization, economic modernization, national integration, and labor legislation. No wonder the Estado Novo, including its normative ideas, began to attract significant attention from academics (Carone 1982; Chacon, 1977; Garcia 1982; Oliveira 1982b; Schwartzman, 1983; Levine 1970). Its widespread depiction as a watershed, explainable primarily by the effects of the Great Depression and the impact of totalitarian ideas, is misjudged,[2] especially if we compare its polity with that of Rio Grande do Sul, the Old Republic’s deviant case

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.