Abstract
Consider the P-complete problem Horn which asks whether a given set of Horn clauses is (un)satisfiable. To solve it one keeps a dynamic set of atoms that are forced to be true. Using the clauses one then adds atoms to this set until saturation is reached. It is easy to see that this dynamic set will in general more than constant size even if we allow to discard already proved atoms. Given that we need logarithmic space to store a single atom on a Turing machine tape this seems like a strong intuitive argument for the hypothesis that logarithmic space is different from polynomial time. We thus tried to find formal models of computation in which this intuitive argument can be made rigorous. Thus, we study computational models that can be simulated in logarithmic space and encompass logspace algorithms which manipulate a constant size of objects that require logarithmic space individually such as pointers or graph nodes. The hope is then to be able to show that such models are provably unable to solve P-complete problems. We report in this survey article on our partial results towards this goal as well as the state-of-the-art in general.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.