Abstract

The finite mixtures approach identifies homogeneous groups within the sample. The data are aggregated into classes sharing similar patterns without any prior knowledge or assumption on the clustering. These clusters are characterized by group-specific regression coefficients to account for between groups heterogeneity. Two different approaches have been independently defined in the literature to compute this estimator not only at the conditional mean but also in the tails. One approach allows the grouping to change according to the selected location. The other defines the clusters once and for all at the conditional mean, and then moves the estimation to the tails, focusing on cluster specific estimates and allowing between groups comparison. Here we compare the behavior of both approaches, and in addition we consider a closely related estimator based on expectiles, together with few others more robust, quantile-based estimators. A case study on students’ performance concludes the analysis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.