Abstract
<h3>To the Editor.—</h3> In the review entitled "Status Report on Computerized ECG Analysis" (239:1201, 1978), Ariet and Crevasse make the following statement: "On the other hand, there seems to be no disagreement that presenting a cardiologist with a computerized analysis of an ECG will improve his own diagnostic capability and save time, particularly in reporting." Since this statement is, in fact, the whole justification for promotion of computer ECG programs, it is interesting—and alarming—to discover that it is simply not true. There is widespread disagreement with the notion that computer ECG analysis "will improve diagnostic capability," and there are convincing data to show that it will not. There are no data at all to substantiate the notion that use of computer ECG analysis will save time. Computer ECG proponents confront a dilemma best stated as a question. By universal agreement (including the authors in question),<i>all</i>computer ECG analyses must
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.