Abstract

Computer-assisted collaborative writing has been gradually employed in L2 and FL contexts due to the introduction of Web 2.0 applications and tools (i.e., Google Docs and wikis) and its benefits in developing learners’ writing skills. Accordingly, extensive literature that dealt with computer-assisted collaborative learning and learners’ perceptions towards this activity has been condensed on shelves by time passing. Thus, a review of former studies over the recent decade is called forth aiming to ameliorate the difficulties of reaching this literature and to awaken broadened knowledge in this promising area. This paper reviewed and discussed about 40 relevant articles published from 2011 to 2019 that dealt with computer-assisted collaborative writing using Web 2.0 tools, precisely Google Docs and wikis, and learners’ perceptions towards this activity (computer-assisted collaborative writing) and tools. All the articles were selected according to specific criteria, where only a true collaborative writing peer-reviewed articles were selected. After that, two main themes were synthesized: (a) collaborative writing outcomes and (b) students’ perceptions, and specific research components in relation to each theme were further reviewed and summarized using illustrative tables. Drawing on the review of this literature, the researchers discuss pedagogical implications in terms of technology integration and writing development and address future research directions including systematically reviewing this topic with teachers’ perceptions of computer-assisted collaborative writing.

Highlights

  • Computer-supported collaborative learning plays a pivotal role in language teaching due to its high significance

  • The author screened all the articles based on titles and abstracts aiming to limit the selection of articles for inclusion according to the following criteria: (1) studies published in recognized peerreviewed CALL-centred journals and (2) a true collaborative writing activity that used a Web 2.0 application and involved collaboration and a co-ownership of a single online or offline text

  • Zou, Wang, & Xing (2016) was excluded from the study because it addresses the task of peer response, which cannot be considered as collaborative writing in that peer response does not involve co-authorship of writing or include the entire writing processes which was defined by Storch (2013) as collaborative planning, joint writing, revision and editing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Computer-supported collaborative learning plays a pivotal role in language teaching due to its high significance. Through time pass, various terms were coined in the different studies; academic research on computer-assisted collaborative learning is a little bit problematic. The most common term through literature is computer-supported collaborative learning. It was used by many contemporary researchers such (Kwon et al, 2014; Goodyear et al, 2014, Zhang et al, 2014; Jeong et al, 2016; Koenig et al, 2017; Bodemer et al, 2018). Other studies referred to it as: computer-based collaborative learning (Littleton, 1999), computer-assisted cooperative learning (Johnson et al, 1986; AbuSeileek, 2012), computerhttps://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/languageliteracy

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call