Abstract

The purpose of many test in the educational and psychological measurement is to measure test takers’ latent trait scores from responses given to a set of items. Over the years, this has been done by traditional methods (paper and pencil tests). However, compared to other test administration models (e.g., adaptive testing), traditional methods are extensively criticized in terms of producing low measurement accuracy and long test length. Adaptive testing has been proposed to overcome these problems. There are two popular adaptive testing approaches. These are computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and computer adaptive multistage testing (ca-MST). The former is a well-known approach that has been predominantly used in this field. We believe that researchers and practitioners are fairly familiar with many aspects of CAT because it has more than a hundred years of history. However, the same thing is not true for the latter one. Since ca-MST is relatively new, many researchers are not familiar with features of it. The purpose of this study is to closely examine the characteristics of ca-MST, including its working principle, the adaptation procedure called the routing method, test assembly, and scoring, and provide an overview to researchers, with the aim of drawing researchers’ attention to ca-MST and encouraging them to contribute to the research in this area. The books, software and future work for ca-MST are also discussed.

Highlights

  • TO TEST ADMINISTRATION MODELSThere are numerous test administration models used to measure student achievement in the educational realm

  • It is possible to see some examples of paper and pencil tests that overcome this challenge by creating multiple linear forms. The drawback to this testing model is delayed scoring and late reporting. This requires test takers to wait for their test scores to become available, which can present a problem if application deadlines are approaching

  • Throughout the past 100 years, much research has been conducted on computerized adaptive testing (CAT), including new item selection methods (e.g., Barrada, Olea, Ponsoda, & Abad, 2008; Chang & Ying, 1996), stopping rules (e.g., Choi, Grady, & Dodd, 2010), and exposure control methods (e.g., Leung, Chang, & Hau, 2002; van der Linden & Chang, 2005)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

TO TEST ADMINISTRATION MODELSThere are numerous test administration models used to measure student achievement in the educational realm. The most widely used traditional model today is paper and pencil test. One big criticism of paper and pencil tests is their vulnerability to security breaches (i.e., cheating). This is because all questions are exposed to all test takers, which is a serious threat for test validity and score reliability (Thompson, 2008). It is possible to see some examples of paper and pencil tests that overcome this challenge by creating multiple linear forms (e.g., the Scholastic Aptitude Test-SAT). The drawback to this testing model is delayed scoring and late reporting. Long test length and low measurement efficiency can be counted as other major disadvantages of paper and pencil tests tests (Yan, von Davier, & Lewis, 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call