Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare abdominal computed tomography (CT) scout views with conventional radiography regarding radiation dose and delineation of drug packages in a porcine body-packer model. Materials and methodsNine samples of illicit drugs packed in ovoid plastic containers were consecutively placed in the rectum of a 121.5kg pig cadaver. Antero-posterior and lateral scout views were obtained at 120kVp and 80mA, 150mA and 200mA, respectively, using a 64-row MDCT. Scout views were compared with conventional abdominal antero-posterior radiographs (77kV and 106±13mAs). Visibility of three body pack characteristics (wrapping, content, shape) was rated independently by two radiologists and summarized to a delineation score ranging from 0 to 9 with a score ≥6 representing sufficient delineation. Mean delineation scores were calculated for each conventional radiography and single plane scout view separately and for a combined rating of antero-posterior and lateral scout views. ResultsEven the lowest single plane scout view delineation score (5.3±2.0 for 80mA lateral; 0.4mSv; sensitivity=44%) was significantly higher than for conventional radiographs (3.1±2.5, p<0.001; 2.4±0.3mSv; sensitivity=11%). Combined reading of antero-posterior and lateral scout views 80mA yielded sufficient delineation (6.2±1.4; 0.8mSv; sensitivity=56%). ConclusionsAll CT scout views showed significantly better delineation ratings and sensitivity than conventional radiographs. Scout views in two planes at 80mA provided a sufficient level of delineation and a sensitivity five times higher than conventional radiography at less than one third of the radiation dose. In case of diagnostic insecurity, CT can be performed without additional logistical effort.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.