Abstract
We studied the relationship between the findings of computed tomography during arteriography (CTA) and computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP), and pathologic findings of 81 small nodular lesions (3 cm or less in diameter) in resected liver specimens. The 81 lesions consisted of 8 dysplastic nodule (DN) lesions, 23 well‐differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (early HCCs) and 50 moderately or poorly differentiated HCCs (advanced HCCs). We also performed standard computed tomography (CT), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography, and compared sensitivities with CTA, CTAP, or combination of CTA and CTAP with other imaging methods. Forty‐four of the 50 advanced HCCs, 12 of the 23 early HCCs, and none of 8 DNs hyperattenuated with CTA and hypoattenuated with CTAP. The sensitivity for the early HCCs was significantly higher for CTA and CTAP in combination as compared with DSA or standard CT. The sensitivity for the advanced HCCs was significantly higher for CTA and CTAP in combination than with DSA. The sequential changes of the blood supply from the portal vein to the hepatic artery during the development of the HCCs were observed. Although CTA and CTAP in combination were useful for the distinction of advanced HCC from early HCC or DN, CTA and CTAP used in combination were not superior to CTA alone in the detection of such lesions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
