Abstract
In vitro cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Define the T1 and T2 anatomic lamina size and evaluate the bone-screw interface strength of various pedicle screw options and intralamina techniques. Transpedicular instrumentation is well accepted, but salvage techniques in the proximal thoracic spine are limited. Intralamina fixation has been described at C2 with favorable biomechanical characteristics. In addition, this technique has been introduced clinically in the proximal thoracic spine. However, the biomechanical potential has not been evaluated. Fourteen fresh-frozen cervicothoracic cadaveric specimens were scanned using dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry for bone mineral density, imaged under computed tomography, and then instrumented in the following configuration: (1) Right-sided pedicle screws in a straight-forward trajectory, (2) "salvage anatomic trajectory pedicle screws, and (3) "salvage" intralamina screws into the contralateral lamina. Insertional torque (IT) was recorded with each revolution and screws were pulled out in-line (POS) with the screw axis to simulate intraoperative failure of fixation. Lamina screws as a salvage technique generated statistically greater peak IT (P = 0.002) and relative POS (P < 0.05) in comparison with straight-forward transpedicular screws as the initial fixation type. Furthermore, lamina screws, when compared to the salvage anatomic trajectory pedicle screws, had a significantly greater peak IT (P = 0.011). The peak IT showed a stronger correlation with POS in lamina screws than straight-forward or anatomic pedicle screws with a similar trend noted in mean IT. Bone mineral density correlated with POS in all methods of fixation. The mean lamina width measured on computed tomography at the thinnest point was 5.9 +/- 0.7 mm (range, 4.9-7.9). Our results suggest that lamina screws, used as a salvage technique in the proximal thoracic spine, provide stronger fixation than transpedicular screws when using standard 4.5-mm cervical screws. In-tralamina screws appear to be a biomechanically sound salvage technique in the region, and appear to be a safe, effective technique for instrumenting the proximal thoracic spine.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.