Abstract
고정형 그리드(stationary grid)에서 그리드 아티팩트(grid artifacts)와 모아레 아티팩트(<TEX>$moir{\acute{e}}$</TEX> pattern artifacts)로 인한 영상의 질의 저하와 이동형 그리드(moving grid)에서의 컷 오프 아티팩트(cut off artifacts)로 인한 영상의 질의 저하를 정량적으로 비교 평가하였다. CDRAD 팬텀(Phantom)과 두께 24 cm의 acryl Phantom을 촬영조건(X-ray exposure conditions)을 100 cm, 80 kVp, 30 mA로 하여 고정형 그리드와 이동형그리드에서 영상(X-ray imaging)을 획득하였다. CDRAD Analyser을 이용한 영상(X-ray imaging) 인식률(observer's perception)은 고정그리드에서 평균(mean) 49.36, 표준편차(standard deviation) 3.76, 최대값(max) 55.56, 최소값 38.67이었고 이동형그리드에서 평균 47.04, 편차 12.69, 최대값 55.56, 최소값 20.89이었다. 이동형 그리드보다 고정형 그리드가 인식률의 평균과 표준편차에서 더 우수하게 나타났다. This study assessed the degradation of image quality caused by grid artifacts and <TEX>$moir{\acute{e}}$</TEX> pattern artifacts in a stationary grid, and the degradation of image quality caused by cut off artifacts in a moving grid. X-ray images were acquired in a stationary grid and a moving grid with X-ray exposure conditions of 100 cm, 80 kVp, and 30 mA using a CDRAD phantom and a 24 cm thickness acrylic phantom. Observer's perception of X-ray imaging using CDRAD Analyzer was mean 49.36, standard deviation 3.76, maximum 55.56, and minimum 38.67 in the stationary grid, and 47.04, 12.69, 55.56, and 20.89, respectively, in the moving grid. The stationary grid was superior to the moving grid in terms of the mean and standard deviation of observer's perception.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
