Abstract

What kinds of symmetry-protected topologically ordered (SPTO) ground states can be used for universal measurement-based quantum computation in a similar fashion to the 2D cluster state? 2D SPTO states are classified not only by global on-site symmetries but also by subsystem symmetries, which are fine-grained symmetries dependent on the lattice geometry. Recently, all states within so-called SPTO cluster phases on the square and hexagonal lattices have been shown to be universal, based on the presence of subsystem symmetries and associated structures of quantum cellular automata. Motivated by this observation, we analyze the computational capability of SPTO cluster phases on all vertex-translative 2D Archimedean lattices. There are four subsystem symmetries here called ribbon, cone, fractal, and 1-form symmetries, and the former three are fundamentally in one-to-one correspondence with three classes of Clifford quantum cellular automata. We conclude that nine out of the eleven Archimedean lattices support universal cluster phases protected by one of the former three symmetries, while the remaining lattices possess 1-form symmetries and have a different capability related to error correction.

Highlights

  • Geometry plays an important role in both quantum information and many-body physics

  • Using 2D vertex-translative Archimedean lattices, we showed that nine of these eleven lattices supported universal cluster phases, where three have glider quantum cellular automaton (QCA) structures and six have fractal QCA structures

  • For glider QCA, we found that the line symmetries were—in some cases—insufficient for construct universal phases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Their composite parts are arranged geometrically, which can in turn result in novel physical properties. A recent paper [35] has constructed tensor network states with underlying Clifford quantum cellular automaton (QCA) in their virtual space, so that they have subsystem symmetries and support computationally universal subsystem SPTO phases. In this Article, we will take a “lattice-first” approach, constructing 2D cluster phases from the subsystem symmetries common to all the ground states on a given 2D lattice and identifying the structure of QCA that underlies its tensor network description.

Graph states
Subsystem symmetries
Finding symmetries
Phases of symmetry-protected topological order
Cluster phases on Archimedean lattices
Determining the QCA
Determining the symmetry
Computational universality
Lattices with cone symmetries
X X XX X X ZZ X X X
Lattices with fractal symmetries
Decorated Archimedean lattices and periodic QCA structure
Archimedean lattices with 1-form symmetries
Changing foliation of time slices: effects of global topology
Conclusion
A Tensor network notation
B MBQC with quasi-1D SSPT phases
Determining fixed point tensors
Oblivious Wire
Unitary gates
Measurement
C Proofs of phase and universality
X X ZZ X X X X
X XX X X

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.