Abstract

Computational studies of low spin d6 cis- and trans-[M(en)2X2]+ complexes (M = Co, Rh, Ir) employing multiple model chemistries find that isomer preferences fall into three categories. Complexes where X is largely a σ-donor (H-, CH3-, CF3-) prefer cis geometries, in keeping with predictions associated with the trans influence series. Complexes where this donor characteristic is augmented by π acceptor behavior (B(CF3)2-, BCl2-, SiCl3-) evince even greater preference for cis geometries. QTAIM charge data suggest this is marked by lower positive charge on the metal in cis complexes. In contrast, complexes where X is a π donor and low in the trans influence series (X = OH-, F-, Cl-, I-) prefer trans geometries to varying degrees. QTAIM calculations indicate that this arises because the cis complexes are destabilized by distortions of the electron density in the M-X bonds. This can be viewed conceptually as resulting from repulsions between lone pair electrons on the ligands. Complexes where the X ligands are moderately trans-influencing and can interact conjugatively (CN-, NC-, NO2-, C≡CH-) prefer trans geometries because they combine destabilization of cis geometries with enhanced stabilization of trans geometries resulting from conjugation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.