Computational structural determination and energy landscape analysis of the hepatic carcinogen 2-(acetylamino)fluorene

Abstract

2-(Acetylamino)fluorene (AAF), a potent mutagen and a prototypical example of the mutagenic aromatic amines, forms covalent adducts to DNA after metabolic activation in the liver. A benchmark study of AAF is presented using a number of the most widely used molecular mechanics and semiempirical computational methods and models. The results are compared to higher-level quantum calculations and to experimentally obtained crystal structures. Hydrogen bonding between AAF molecules in the crystal phase complicates the direct comparison of gas-phase theoretical calculations with experiment, so Hartree–Fock (HF) and Becke–Perdew (BP) density functional theory (DFT) calculations are used as benchmarks for the semiempirical and molecular mechanics results. Systematic conformer searches and dihedral energy landscapes were carried out for AAF using the SYBYL and MMFF94 molecular mechanics force fields; the AM1, PM3 and MNDO semiempirical quantum mechanics methods; HF using the 3-21G*and 6-31G* basis sets; and DFT using the nonlocal BP functional and double numerical polarization basis sets. MMFF94, AM1, HF and DFT calculations all predict the same planar structures, whereas SYBYL, MNDO and PM3 all predict various nonplanar geometries. The AM1 energy landscape is in substantial agreement with HF and DFT predictions; MMFF94 is qualitatively similar to HF and DFT; and the MNDO, PM3 and SYBYL results are qualitatively different from the HF and DFT results and from each other. These results are attributed to deficiencies in MNDO, PM3 and SYBYL. The MNDO, PM3 and SYBYL models may be unreliable for compounds in which an amide group is immediately adjacent to an aromatic ring.