Abstract

Research about equivalence has commonly utilized human participants as experimental subjects. More recently, computational models have been capable of reproducing performances observed in experiments with humans. The computational model often utilized is called RELNET, and it simulates training and testing trials of conditional relations using the matching-to-sample procedure (MTS). The differentiation between sample stimulus and comparison stimuli, indispensable in MTS, implies operational difficulties for simulations. For this reason, new studies seek to utilize alternative procedures to MTS, which do not differentiate the functions of the antecedent stimuli. This work evaluated the possibility of developing a new computational model to simulate equivalence class formation using the go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli. In Experiment 1, artificial neural networks were utilized to simulate training of the AB and BC relations as well as the testing of the AC relation. The results showed that four out of six runs demonstrated equivalence class formation. Experiment 2 evaluated whether the additional class training performed in Experiment 1, which was analogous to the simulation of pre-experimental experience of human participants, would be essential for simulating the establishment of equivalence classes. It was found that it was not possible to simulate equivalence class formation without the additional class training. Altogether, the experiments show that it is possible to simulate equivalence class formation using the go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli and that it is necessary to conduct additional class training. The model developed is, therefore, an alternative to RELNET for the study of equivalence relations using computational simulations.

Highlights

  • Research about equivalence has commonly utilized human participants as experimental subjects

  • Experiment 1 evaluated the possibility of utilizing artificial neural networks to simulate equivalence class formation using the go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli

  • The result that not all runs met the criteria resembles the experiments in which the go/no-go procedure is utilized with humans, given that not all participants demonstrate equivalence class formation (e.g., Debert, Matos, & McIlvane, 2007; Perez, Campos, & Debert, 2009; Debert, Huziwara, Faggiani, De Mathis, & Mcilvane, 2009; Campos, Debert, Barros, & McIlvane, 2011; Grisante et al, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research about equivalence has commonly utilized human participants as experimental subjects. Research has been developed utilizing computational models (artificial neural networks) to simulate equivalence class formation (e.g., Barnes & Hampson, 1993; Cullinan, Barnes, Hampson, & Lyddy, 1994; Lyddy & Barnes-Holmes, 2007; Lyddy, Barnes-Holmes, & Hampson, 2001; Okada, Sakagami, & Yamakawa, 2005; Tovar & Torres, 2012) These models are capable of reproducing performances observed in humans, having the advantage of providing greater control over the experimental variables, creating a stable and controllable environment that could be difficult to obtain in experiments with humans and other animals (Lyddy & Barnes-Holmes, 2007; McClelland, 2009; Tovar & Torres, 2012). A similar conclusion was found by experiments involving humans (e.g., Arntzen & Holth, 1997)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call