Abstract

The present work highlights the capacity of disparate lattice Boltzmann strategies in simulating natural convection and heat transfer phenomena during the unsteady period of the flow. Within the framework of Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook collision operator, diverse lattice Boltzmann schemes emerged from two different embodiments of discrete Boltzmann expression and three distinct forcing models. Subsequently, computational performance of disparate lattice Boltzmann strategies was tested upon two different thermo-hydrodynamics configurations, namely the natural convection in a differentially-heated cavity and the Rayleigh-Bènard convection. For the purposes of exhibition and validation, the steady-state conditions of both physical systems were compared with the established numerical results from the classical computational techniques. Excellent agreements were observed for both thermo-hydrodynamics cases. Numerical results of both physical systems demonstrate the existence of considerable discrepancy in the computational characteristics of different lattice Boltzmann strategies during the unsteady period of the simulation. The corresponding disparity diminished gradually as the simulation proceeded towards a steady-state condition, where the computational profiles became almost equivalent. Variation in the discrete lattice Boltzmann expressions was identified as the primary factor that engenders the prevailed heterogeneity in the computational behaviour. Meanwhile, the contribution of distinct forcing models to the emergence of such diversity was found to be inconsequential. The findings of the present study contribute to the ventures to alleviate contemporary issues regarding proper selection of lattice Boltzmann schemes in modelling fluid flow and heat transfer phenomena.

Highlights

  • The Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) has raised considerable interest amongst the community of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) due to its efficacy in handling multitude fluid flow problems

  • Ubertini et al [6] investigated three distinct models of discrete lattice Boltzmann expression for hydrodynamics simulation, namely the first-order, the second-order, and the scheme derived through implementation of the Verlet discretisation, which all showed a secondorder accuracy both in spatial and time coordinates with respect to the convective system

  • Similar to the former case of natural convection in a differentially-heated cavity, the steady-state flow profile from scenario IIB was selected for exhibition and validation purposes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) has raised considerable interest amongst the community of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) due to its efficacy in handling multitude fluid flow problems. Ubertini et al [6] investigated three distinct models of discrete lattice Boltzmann expression for hydrodynamics simulation, namely the first-order, the second-order, and the scheme derived through implementation of the Verlet discretisation, which all showed a secondorder accuracy both in spatial and time coordinates with respect to the convective system They argued that such equivalence breaks down when the nature of the physical systems necessitates the inclusion of external forcing expression. Mohamad and Kuzmin [13] investigated the behaviour of three different forcing models by simulating natural convection in closed and open-ended cavities They found that the investigated forcing models produced equivalent numerical solutions at steady-state conditions.

Governing Mathematical Remarks and Principal Dimensionless Groups
Lattice Boltzmann Expressions from Distinct Truncation Order
Conclusions
Methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call