Abstract

Research on social cognition has fruitfully applied computational modeling approaches to explain how observers understand and reason about others’ mental states. By contrast, there has been less work on modeling observers’ understanding of emotional states. We propose an intuitive theory framework to studying affective cognition—how humans reason about emotions—and derive a taxonomy of inferences within affective cognition. Using this taxonomy, we review formal computational modeling work on such inferences, including causal reasoning about how others react to events, reasoning about unseen causes of emotions, reasoning with multiple cues, as well as reasoning from emotions to other mental states. In addition, we provide a roadmap for future research by charting out inferences—such as hypothetical and counterfactual reasoning about emotions—that are ripe for future computational modeling work. This framework proposes unifying these various types of reasoning as Bayesian inference within a common “intuitive Theory of Emotion.” Finally, we end with a discussion of important theoretical and methodological challenges that lie ahead in modeling affective cognition.

Highlights

  • Recent developments in computational cognitive modeling have allowed researchers to specify and test precise hypotheses about how people make inferences about their social world

  • In this paper we have outlined a framework for understanding affective cognition as inference within an intuitive theory of emotion

  • We derived a taxonomy of inferences (Table 1), and we have discussed these inferences both with respect to recent work in computationally modeling affective cognition, as well as future challenges for modeling each of these inferences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent developments in computational cognitive modeling have allowed researchers to specify and test precise hypotheses about how people make inferences about their social world These include inferences about what others desire and believe about the world (e.g., Baker, Jara-Ettinger, Saxe, & Tenenbaum, 2017; Goodman et al, 2006), what others mean when they use language to communicate (Frank & Goodman, 2012; Goodman & Frank, 2016; Goodman & Stuhlm€uller, 2013), and what future decisions others might make (Jara-Ettinger, Gweon, Schulz, & Tenenbaum, 2016; Jern & Kemp, 2015). We provide a roadmap for future research, by highlighting inferences that have yet to be studied computationally, and by discussing important theoretical and methodological challenges that lie ahead

Laying out an intuitive theory of emotions
Intuitive causes of emotions
Intuitive effects of emotions
A taxonomy of affective cognitive inferences within the intuitive theory
Emotion recognition
Third-person appraisal
Inferring causes of emotions
Emotional cue integration
Reverse appraisal
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.