Abstract
The classical computational theory of mind (CTM) holds that many important mental processes are computations similar to those executed by Turing machines. This article compares two alternative frameworks through which one can develop CTM: formal-syntactic computationalism and content-involving computationalism. According to formal-syntactic computationalism, computation is sensitive to syntax but not semantics. Mental computation manipulates formal-syntactic items without regard to any representational properties those items may have. According to content-involving computationalism, certain computational descriptions characterize mental states through their representational properties rather than any alleged formal-syntactic properties. The article examines strengths and weaknesses of each framework.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
