Abstract

AbstractSeveral computational methods have been recently developed for the prediction of protein interactions. The first class of these methods exclusively uses sequence information for the predictions, including three methods rooted in comparative genomics (phylogenetic profiles,conserved gene neighborhood, andgene fusion), and two other methods that use multiple sequence alignments as input information (in silico two‐hybridandMirrorTreemethods). Interestingly, these two methods can be extended beyond the prediction of interaction partners to the detection of regions of interactions and key functional residues, as demonstrated in various experimental systems. The second type of computational methods exploits the information of protein structures by analyzing the observed combinatorial of protein domains or by extrapolating the structural information of protein complexes to compatible sequences.Several studies have addressed the interesting possibilities of combining predicted and experimentally derived interactions. The current view is that the overlap between the interactions predicted by different methods is relatively small, and the various experimental and computational methods seem to be able to detect specific types of protein interactions.A number of computational methods for predicting functional and/or physical relations between proteins have been developed in the last 4 years. The computational methods are strongly rooted in the traces left by the evolution in the organization and composition of bacterial genomes (seeMicrobial genomes). The methods developed can be divided into three categories: those methods that only use the information from genomes and sequences for the prediction of interaction partners, those methods that use the information of protein complexes of known structures (seeFundamentals of protein structure and function,Large complexes by X‐ray methods, andLarge complexes and molecular machines by electron microscopy), and those methods that use the puzzle composition of proteins in domains (seeClassification of proteins into families,Pfam: the protein families database, andCOGs) to predict the probability of interaction between the corresponding proteins.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.