Abstract

BackgroundGene regulatory networks with different topological and/or dynamical properties might exhibit similar behavior. System that is less perceptive for the perturbations of its internal and external factors should be preferred. Methods for sensitivity and robustness assessment have already been developed and can be roughly divided into local and global approaches. Local methods focus only on the local area around nominal parameter values. This can be problematic when parameters exhibits the desired behavior over a large range of parameter perturbations or when parameter values are unknown. Global methods, on the other hand, investigate the whole space of parameter values and mostly rely on different sampling techniques. This can be computationally inefficient. To address these shortcomings ’glocal’ approaches were developed that apply global and local approaches in an effective and rigorous manner.ResultsHerein, we present a computational approach for ’glocal’ analysis of viable parameter regions in biological models. The methodology is based on the exploration of high-dimensional viable parameter spaces with global and local sampling, clustering and dimensionality reduction techniques. The proposed methodology allows us to efficiently investigate the viable parameter space regions, evaluate the regions which exhibit the largest robustness, and to gather new insights regarding the size and connectivity of the viable parameter regions. We evaluate the proposed methodology on three different synthetic gene regulatory network models, i.e. the repressilator model, the model of the AC-DC circuit and the model of the edge-triggered master-slave D flip-flop.ConclusionsThe proposed methodology provides a rigorous assessment of the shape and size of viable parameter regions based on (1) the mathematical description of the biological system of interest, (2) constraints that define feasible parameter regions and (3) cost function that defines the desired or observed behavior of the system. These insights can be used to assess the robustness of biological systems, even in the case when parameter values are unknown and more importantly, even when there are multiple poorly connected viable parameter regions in the solution space. Moreover, the methodology can be efficiently applied to the analysis of biological systems that exhibit multiple modes of the targeted behavior.

Highlights

  • Gene regulatory networks with different topological and/or dynamical properties might exhibit similar behavior

  • We evaluate the proposed methodology on the repressilator model, on the model of the ACDC circuit that can switch between the oscillatory and bistable behavior as described in [20] and on the model of the biological edge-triggered D flip-flop in a masterslave configuration proposed by Magdevska et al [14]

  • Repressilator Repressilator is a simple Gene regulatory network (GRN) composed of an odd number of repressors connected in a negative feedback loop

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gene regulatory networks with different topological and/or dynamical properties might exhibit similar behavior. Hafner et al [13] developed a ’glocal’ robustness analysis and model discrimination method that can be used for the analysis of circadian as well as other oscillators This approach allows us to efficiently explore the model’s parameter space and assess its robustness. This is not problematic for the evolutionary developed systems, where the viable solution space is usually connected because natural systems have evolved through small, gradual changes of individual biochemical parameters While this may be true for the naturally occurring motifs, it is not necessarily the case for the synthetically developed gene regulatory networks (GRNs). When designing synthetic GRNs, one could choose different parts, e.g., transcription factors (TFs) with similar behavior and different kinetic properties, such as bindingsite affinities and degradation rates This problem was addressed by Zamora-Sillero et al in [17], where they proposed an efficient ellipsoid based sampling. This can occur if the viable solution space is loosely connected

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.