Abstract

BackgroundIn recent years, automated analyses using novel NLP methods have been used to investigate language abnormalities in schizophrenia. In contrast, only a few studies used automated language analyses in bipolar disorder. To our knowledge, no previous research compared automated language characteristics of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and bipolar disorder (FEBD) using NLP methods. MethodsOur study included 53 FEP, 40 FEBD and 50 healthy control participants who are native Turkish speakers. Speech samples of the participants in the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) underwent automated generic and part-of-speech analyses, as well as sentence-level semantic similarity analysis based on SBERT. ResultsBoth FEBD and FEP were associated with the use of shorter sentences and increased sentence-level semantic similarity but less semantic alignment with the TAT pictures. FEP also demonstrated reduced verbosity and syntactic complexity. FEP differed from FEBD in reduced verbosity, decreased first-person singular pronouns, fewer conjunctions, increased semantic similarity as well as shorter sentence and word length. The mean classification accuracy was 82.45 % in FEP vs HC, 71.1 % in FEBD vs HC, and 73 % in FEP vs FEBD. After Bonferroni correction, the severity of negative symptoms in FEP was associated with reduced verbal output and increased 5th percentile of semantic similarity. LimitationsThe main limitation of this study was the cross-sectional nature. ConclusionOur findings demonstrate that both patient groups showed language abnormalities, which were more severe and widespread in FEP compared to FEBD. Our results suggest that NLP methods reveal transdiagnostic linguistic abnormalities in FEP and FEBD.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.