Abstract

BackgroundA computation approach based on integrating high throughput binding affinity comparison and binding descriptor classifications was utilized to establish the correlation among substrate properties and their affinity to Breast Cancer Resistant Protein (BCRP). The uptake rates of Mitoxantrone in the presence of various substrates were evaluated as an in vitro screening index for comparison of their binding affinity to BCRP.The effects of chemical properties of various chemotherapeutics, such as antiviral, antibiotic, calcium channel blockers, anticancer and antifungal agents, on their affinity to BCRP, were evaluated using HEK (human embryonic kidney) cells in which 3 polymorphs, namely 482R (wild type) and two mutants (482G and 482T) of BCRP, have been identified. The quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) model was developed using the sequential approaches of Austin Model 1 (AM1), CODESSA program, heuristic method (HM) and multiple linear regression (MLR) to establish the relationship between structural specificity of BCRP substrates and their uptake rates by BCRP polymorphs.ResultsThe BCRP mutations may induce conformational changes as manifested by the altered uptake rates of Mitoxantrone by BCRP in the presence of other competitive binding substrates that have a varying degree of affinities toward BCRP efflux. This study also revealed that the binding affinity of test substrates to each polymorph was affected by varying descriptors, such as constitutional, topological, geometrical, electrostatic, thermodynamic, and quantum chemical descriptors.ConclusionDescriptors involved with the net surface charge and energy level of substrates seem to be the common integral factors for defining binding specificity of selected substrates to BCRP polymorph. The reproducible outcomes and validation process further supported the accuracy of the computational model in assessing the correlation among descriptors involved with substrate affinity to BCRP polymorph. A quantitative computation approach will provide important structural insight into optimal designing of new chemotherapeutic agents with improved pharmacological efficacies.

Highlights

  • A computation approach based on integrating high throughput binding affinity comparison and binding descriptor classifications was utilized to establish the correlation among substrate properties and their affinity to Breast Cancer Resistant Protein (BCRP)

  • There was a report that drug resident time and uptake amount are better correlated with drug efficacy than the binding affinity [4,5,6], suggesting that lead optimization could be efficiently accomplished with analyzing the drug uptake profiles

  • Breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP) known as ABCP or MXR or ABCG2 is a member of transporter super family ATP binding cassette (ABC) proteins

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A computation approach based on integrating high throughput binding affinity comparison and binding descriptor classifications was utilized to establish the correlation among substrate properties and their affinity to Breast Cancer Resistant Protein (BCRP). There are two integral screening approaches that could help identify and characterize the substrates and inhibitors of the efflux proteins and/or transporter system; the measurement of binding affinity and toxicity analysis of substrate compounds [3]. Numerous methodologies have been proposed for drug-target screening strategies based on binding affinity [7,8], there are no efficient computational tools available for the accurate estimation of the drug uptake profiles from the point of the molecular structures. The uptake rates of Mitoxantrone in the presence of various substrate compounds were examined as an in vitro screening index that could help to characterize the binding properties of chemotherapeutic drugs to tumor cells or efflux proteins. The therapeutically available concentrations of certain agents increased in BCRP knock-out animal models that were highly prone to Mitoxantrone induced toxicity [17]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call