Abstract
This paper presents a case study to compare the zone-level actual supplied ventilation rate with minimum required ventilation rate for a typical variable air volume (VAV) operation. The minimum required ventilation rate was computed using zone-level actual occupancy, plug and lighting load data. Two different algorithms were adopted to collect the actual zone-level occupancy information using camera-based technology which are (a) area-based occupancy counting and (b) row-based occupancy counting. Similarly, zone-level Plug, lighting and air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation (ACMV) system-related energy data were taken from the energy submeters and BTU meters. The median values of actual supplied ventilation rates are 0.16, 0.14, 0.14 and 0.12 m3/s for the classroom, computer room, open office and closed office, respectively. For the same zone, the computed minimum required ventilation rates are 0.10, 0.09, 0.10 and 0.08 m3/s, respectively. This case study shows that except during evening classes in classroom and computer room, the actual ventilation supplied is much more than the minimum required ventilation. These over and under ventilation scenarios have been identified as an indicator for energy wastage and poor indoor environmental quality, respectively.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.