Abstract
This paper considers the computability of the Nash equilibria of a game, i.e. the possibility of an algorithm to play the game with respect to Nash equilibria. We consider a two-person game, in which both players have countably many feasible actions and their particular payoff functions are computable in the sense that there are algorithms to compute the values of ones for any given action profile. It is proved that there exists no algorithm to decide whether or not a given action profile is a Nash equilibrium. Moreover, we show that the set of the Nash equilibria is not empty, but there exists no algorithm to enumerate it allowing repetitions. These results mean that no Nash equilibrium of the game cannot be computed by any human being in practice, although the existence of the Nash equilibria can be proved in theory. Indeed, it is impossible to supply the players with algorithms regarding how they should decide whether or not a given action profile is a Nash equilibrium of the game or how they should enumerate all Nash equilibria. On the other hand, I show that if players’s payoff functions are any rational number valued polynomials bounded from the above with rational number coefficients, then the Nash equilibria of the game are computable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.