Abstract

Saul Kripke once noted that there is a tight connection between computation and de re knowledge of whatever the computation acts upon. For example, the Euclidean algorithm can produce knowledge of which number is the greatest common divisor of two numbers. Arguably, algorithms operate directly on syntactic items, such as strings, and on numbers and the like only via how the numbers are represented. So we broach matters of notation. The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between the notations acceptable for computation, the usual idealizations involved in theories of computability, flowing from Alan Turing’s monumental work, and de re propositional attitudes toward numbers and other mathematical objects.

Highlights

  • It is generally recognized that context sensitivity is a fact of linguistic life, and a large number of tools have been developed to accommodate this feature of natural languages

  • Extreme Platonism aside, we have de re knowledge or belief about particular numbers only after we manage to represent them in language or thought

  • One option is to concede that the notion of computability, as applied to number-theoretic functions, is relative to a notation, a kind of context-sensitivity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our problem here is not exactly that, but rather how we manage to have de re knowledge of particular numbers, such as twelve, sixty-four, and four. The other vexed matter concerns de re propositional attitudes generally. O. Quine [5,6], among others, pointed out that, in general, such matters are highly context-sensitive, and, in particular, interest-relative. It is generally recognized that context sensitivity is a fact of linguistic life, and a large number of tools have been developed to accommodate this feature of natural languages. De re propositional attitude reports concern ways that ordinary objects and people are represented, in language or in thought (if those are different). Extreme (epistemic) Platonism aside, we have de re knowledge or belief about particular numbers only after we manage to represent them in language or thought.

Notation
De re Attitudes toward Numbers
Idealization
Connecting the Dots
Beyond the Natural Numbers

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.