Abstract

There is growing evidence to show increased mental ill health in women compulsorily separated from their babies at birth (Cantwell et al., MBRRACE-UK, 2018:56). For imprisoned women, the risk of self-harm and suicide may be exacerbated. This article draws on in-depth interviews with a sample of 28 imprisoned pregnant women/new mothers, 10 prison staff and observations to discuss the experience of separation from or anticipation of separation of women from their babies. Oakley (Signs, 4:607-631, 1980) reflected on the transition to motherhood with reference to the sociology of loss of identity. Women who have been compulsorily separated from their babies experience subjugated loss out of place with societal norms. The experiences of compulsory separation, in relation to concepts of disenfranchised grief, resonate with Lovell's (Social Science & Medicine, 17:755-761, 1983) research into the altered identities of mothers when loss occurs through late miscarriage or stillbirth. Additionally, this type of complex loss also denies a woman her identity as a 'mother'. This article offers a fresh sociological perspective on the ways loss and grief are experienced by women facing separation from their babies in prison, drawing on concepts of uncertainty, loss and disenfranchised grief.

Highlights

  • This article explores the circumstances of women experiencing compulsory separation from their newborn babies in English prisons

  • The following details findings resulting from the thematic analysis, whereby the women's accounts are drawn on to explain their experiences during pregnancy, birth and post birth

  • The following discussion expands upon the themes of disenfranchised grief (Doka, 1999; Thompson & Doka, 2017), the notion of ambiguous loss (Boss, 2010) and concepts of loss framed within Lovell’s (1983) research into experiences of stillbirth

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article explores the circumstances of women experiencing compulsory separation from their newborn babies in English prisons. It opens up with a review of the broader literature in relation to court-­ordered child removal experiences of separation in the community. Broadhurst et al (2015) estimated that 2018 babies were removed for child protection reasons, primarily from women in the community, at or around the time of birth in 2013, an increase of over 60% since 2008. Broadhurst and Mason (2020) revisited in-d­ epth interviews undertaken between 2014 and 2017 with 72 birth mothers who had experienced recurrent child removals. Women felt a deep distrust of professional services, and yet, there was no provision of compulsory support. Critchley (2020) reported ethnographic research findings, which focussed upon practitioner experiences including the complexity of decisions and found that the social worker would need to be ‘completely convinced’ before making the decision for a child to remain with his/her mother

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call