Abstract
One of the basic issues behind the continuing controversy over mandatory versus discretionary retirement of older workers is the capacity of such workers to meet standards of performance. In particular, it is debated whether there is any close association between age and performance, such as to justify the establishment of an arbitrary age at which all members of a particular occupational group should be required to retire from that employment. This issue has become acute in the air lines since the issuance of a regulation by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency, on March 15, 1960, forbidding any individual who had attained age 60 to continue in service as a pilot on a scheduled air carrier. This regulation, which is now in litigation, was preceded by a series of retirement disputes between the Air Line Pilots Association and various commercial air carriers under the Railway Labor Act. This article traces these disputes, describes the arguments involved in the legal contest over the FAA directive, and discusses the industrial relations developments which may follow if the retirement regulation is sustained in the courts. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.