Abstract

Compulsory interventions severely restrict constitutional rights of the patients. They are exceptional measures only to be considered under strict and clearly defined ethical and juridical conditions. They do confront mental health professionals with difficult questions challenging their individual professional identity as well as the identity of psychiatry in general. This complex field is discussed in reference to the conceptual history of psychiatry, to different contemporary approaches to the notion of autonomy, and to three ethically demanding issues: autonomy and care, psychiatry and society, personhood and interpersonal relations. Engaging open mindedly in these debates may be cumbersome for psychiatry, but will yield a substantial return, particularly regarding its identity and acceptance by society.

Highlights

  • The issue of compulsory interventions in psychiatry is usually regarded as a mainly ethical and practical topic

  • Two different epistemological levels are distinctively intertwined: the theoretical level reflecting upon the “object” of psychiatric work in therapeutic or research activities on the one hand, and the practical level focusing on how psychiatric services can be optimally organized within the competing demands of being effective, adequate, and economically justifiable1 on the other hand

  • Any therapist will try hard to build a therapeutic relationship even under the difficult, if not paradoxical, conditions of compulsory interventions. This directly alludes to the self-understanding of psychiatric professionals and, more general, to the identity of psychiatry

Read more

Summary

Paul Hoff *

Compulsory interventions severely restrict constitutional rights of the patients They are exceptional measures only to be considered under strict and clearly defined ethical and juridical conditions. They do confront mental health professionals with difficult questions challenging their individual professional identity as well as the identity of psychiatry in general. This complex field is discussed in reference to the conceptual history of psychiatry, to different contemporary approaches to the notion of autonomy, and to three ethically demanding issues: autonomy and care, psychiatry and society, personhood and interpersonal relations.

INTRODUCTION
The Ethical Dilemma of Autonomy Versus Care
The Interrelation of Psychiatry and Society
Personhood and Interpersonal Relations as Conceptual Constituents of Psychiatry
CONCLUDING REMARKS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.