Compromised strategy resolves intersexual conflict over pre-copulatory guarding duration

Abstract

An evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) on pre-copulatory mate-guarding duration is separately obtained for males and females, by assuming that either the male or female can control perfectly the timing of guarding. A difference between sexes in an ESS brings on an intersexual conflict, in particular when the ESS of the actively searching sex (usually male) is longer than that of the other. We analyse two extreme situations, in which the female mating stages are either perfectly synchronized or uniformly distributed. The analysis reveals that (1) the male ESS for guarding duration is longer than the female ESS in the synchronized case if the sex ratio is male-biased, (2) the difference in ESSs is higher for a more male-biased sex ratio, less guarding costs or a higher encounter rate, and (3) an asynchronous female mating cycle extends the conflict region towards female-biased sex ratios. We show by including conflict costs in fitnesses of both sexes that intersexual conflict may be resolved by a compromised solution, where the starting time of mate guarding is an intermediate value between the ESSs of the two sexes. This compromised strategy depends on both fitness increments of winning the conflict and physical power in controlling the opponent and tends to approach the ESS of the commoner sex in highly biased sex ratios. If both actors engaged in a conflict have enough information on each other, a compromise without an overt struggle may be reached.