Abstract

Objectives Evaluation of the properties of recently introduced bulk-fill composite resins from different aspects is important. We aimed to evaluate the compressive strength of two bulk-fill composite resins with different viscosities compared with one conventional composite resin. Methods This in vitro study evaluated two different bulk-fill composite resins and one conventional composite resin. Twelve samples were prepared for each group in a mold, measuring 4 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height. In group 1, x-tra fil bulk-fill composite resin was light-cured with 4-mm thickness for 40 seconds. Then, a 2-mm thick increment of composite resin from the same brand was placed over it and light-cured. In group 2, x-tra base composite resin was light-cured with 4 mm thickness. Then, Grandio conventional composite resin was placed over it with 2-mm thickness and light-cured. In group 3, Grandio conventional composite resin was placed in 2-mm thickness using the incremental technique and light-cured. The samples were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 48 hours, followed by the compressive strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The data were analyzed with SPSS 21 using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results There were no significant differences in compressive strength values of the three study groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The bulk-fill composite resins evaluated in the present study exhibited compressive strength values similar to that of the conventional composite resin, indicating favorable compressive strength, with decreased working time.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call